FORT COLLINS- In a split vote, Fort Collins City Council decided against appealing a court ruling related to enforcement of the city’s camping ban.
Council voted 4-3 to not appeal the recent ruling, which found that Fort Collins Police Services unconstitutionally ticketed a man for sleeping in his car at a rest stop in 2018. ACLU of Colorado assisted the man, Adam Wiemold, in his appeal of the ticket.
Council considered the possible appeal, along with another potential appeal related to the Hughes Stadium ballot measure, during a two-hour executive session on Tuesday.
When they emerged, three council members said they supported an appeal: Mayor Wade Troxell and council members Ross Cunniff and Susan Gutowsky. As one motivation for the appeal, Troxell cited a need for clarification on the question of voluntary vs. involuntary homelessness.
Several council members said they don’t think the courts should weigh in on the question of voluntary or involuntary homelessness.
“I think the judge was very clear that this ruling was specific to this case, and a large reason the city wants to appeal is to define the differences between involuntary and voluntary homelessness, which I think isn’t really anyone’s business,” council member Julie Pignataro said.
Council members Emily Gorgol and Ken Summers agreed, and council member Melanie Potyondy also voted to not file an appeal.
It ‘s not yet clear what the decision means for future enforcement of the camping ban.
“We continue to assess what camping-related enforcement and prosecution approaches are appropriate with any new developments in the law and real-world context,” city attorney Carrie Daggett told the Coloradoan in an email on Thursday, adding that “the outcome of the Wiemold case will be part of the overall context as camping ticket cases are prosecuted and decided in municipal court; it is not clear at this time how much impact it will have.”
Field didn’t strike down Fort Collins’ camping ban, which states that people can’t sleep in public places that are not designated for camping or on private properties, except temporarily with the owner’s permission. Fort Collins police have used the policy to ticket people for camping outside or in vehicles.
Instead, Field said her ruling applied specifically to Wiemold’s case. He was an employee at Fort Collins Rescue Mission at the time of the ticket and was prohibited from staying there. He said he couldn’t sleep at the Catholic Charities shelter because of employee policy and possible safety issues.
“The facts here would likely not apply to other individuals who are homeless in Fort Collins who would have access to either shelter in Fort Collins,” Field wrote in her ruling.
Still, the ACLU argued that Field’s ruling could mean that Fort Collins can’t enforce its camping ban in other circumstances when people can’t access shelters: If both shelters are full or they face life circumstances that prevent them from staying at a shelter.
“Some people just can’t go to the shelters,” ACLU of Colorado Legal Director Mark Silverstein previously told the Coloradoan. “To punish them for sleeping outdoors when they have no choice violates the Constitution.”
Jacy Marmaduke for the Colorodoan
Haltzman Law Firm
Want to know how much criminal defense representation will cost or the value of your personal injury claim? Please leave your contact information and a brief description of your case, and we will be in touch in less than 24 hours.
The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.
The transmission and receipt of information contained on this Web site, in whole or in part, or communication with Haltzman Law Firm, P.C. via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship between us and any recipient. You should not send us any confidential information in response to this webpage. Such responses will not create a lawyer-client relationship, and whatever you disclose to us will not be privileged or confidential unless we have agreed to act as your legal counsel and/or you have executed a written engagement agreement with Haltzman Law Firm, P.C. The material on this website may not reflect the most current legal developments. The content and interpretation of the law addressed herein is subject to revision. We disclaim all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this site to the fullest extent permitted by law. Do not act or refrain from acting upon this information without seeking professional legal counsel.